Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:05:01 +0100 From: Sander Smeenk <ssm+fbsd-questions@freshdot.net> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vinum & U320 SCSI, slower than UDMA100 IDE ? Message-ID: <20031201190501.GA17737@freshdot.net> In-Reply-To: <7F4B0982-23CD-11D8-8529-003065A70D30@shire.net> References: <20031127124435.GA24772@freshdot.net> <7F4B0982-23CD-11D8-8529-003065A70D30@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC (chad@shire.net): > >I would understand if the RAID10 array was as fast as IDE, or faster, > >but i'm a bit amazed by these results. The RAID10 array was built on 4x > >36.7gb Ultra320 SCSI disks, connected to an Adaptec 39320D Ultra320 > >SCSI adapter, which is a PCI-X card, configured in a PCI-X slot. > Try creating the same vinum set using 4 ATA100 disks and see what > happens when compared to your UeberSCSI vinum set... Thing is, I don't have 4 of the same sized disks available to try this out. And the overall results people post on the web is that vinum RAID is way faster than normal disks, so I am very curious as to what I might have done wrong... Thanks, Sander. -- | Why do they call it "chilli" if it's hot? | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031201190501.GA17737>