From owner-freebsd-sparc Fri Jan 28 2:28:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from bsd4us.org (cn386092-a.newcas1.de.home.com [24.40.46.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AC914DBD for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 02:28:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lgriffin@BSD4US.ORG) Received: from localhost (lgriffin@localhost) by bsd4us.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA17633 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 04:35:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 04:34:57 -0500 (EST) From: Lyndon Griffin To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Timeline for development In-Reply-To: <38913C0C.734FF6B1@softweyr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What was intended as a joke has certainly been taken too seriously - probably I blew the delivery. I think I'll stick to the coding from now on, maybe I'll get better laughs there ;) <:) Lyndon Griffin http://www.bsd4us.org On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Wes Peters wrote: > > > > Why not sparc-sun-unknown-freebsd? It should make you both happy. > > I used to build compiles for x86 svr4 with "bozotheclone" in the vendor field. > Someone at Intel (a customer in those days) noticed and complained. > > The total percentage of SPARC systems sold by vendors other than Sun is so > small as to be ignorable. Besides, most of the tools will automagically > guess "sun" given the architecture "sparc". Why make it difficult? > > Plus, I'm a Sun bigot. ;^) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message