From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 13:59:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20651065670; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53A98FC19; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4RDqUDM051188; Tue, 27 May 2008 06:52:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from kargl@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m4RDqUv3051187; Tue, 27 May 2008 06:52:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kargl) From: "Steven G. Kargl" Message-Id: <200805271352.m4RDqUv3051187@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080527101254.GB8595@merlin.emma.line.org> To: Matthias Andree Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 06:52:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124a (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/123879: databases/db41 fails during configure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 13:59:42 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote: > > The patch is rejected, db41 is fine on all -STABLE and -RELEASE AFAICT. > > Insult as incentive? Won't work for me. > You just forfeited any chance of my looking at your issue. > Whatever. You already sent me two private emails that state you have no intention of fixing the port. The bug report should remain open. A maintainer (and I use this term very loosely), who is too lazy to maintain his port, is a poor excuse for suspending a bug report. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/