Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 19:33:25 -0700 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: David Cheney <david.cheney@canonical.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: freebsd/pandaboard Spurious interrupt detected [0x000003ff] Message-ID: <1383532405.31172.137.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAHPQsEQQ%2BZ29vZj%2BasoWB3mFPo-wU%2BJJ7LytGJ=q8BmPSozd_w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHPQsESP2aQxYDj0J=BdDUDhQdWnxMuAJ5fPNELGqLPsR==Ktg@mail.gmail.com> <1383526716.31172.131.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAHPQsEQQ%2BZ29vZj%2BasoWB3mFPo-wU%2BJJ7LytGJ=q8BmPSozd_w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 13:19 +1100, David Cheney wrote: > Thanks Ian, try now. > > As a question to the group, I have the following hardware > > Pandaboard > BeagleBone Black > RPi > > And I am trying to bring up Freebsd/arm so I can get our Go builder > working again[1]. Of these candidates, which is the one you would > recommend ? > > Cheers > > Dave > > [1] build.golang.org The pandaboard is the fastest of those I think, but the Beaglebone may be the best combo of speed and well-supported if these pandaboard problems don't go away quickly for you. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1383532405.31172.137.camel>