From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 18 0:10:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles193.castles.com [208.214.165.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9881538F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:10:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA00640; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:04:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903180804.AAA00640@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "David E. Cross" Cc: Matthew Dillon , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KVA size changes in 3.1-stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:44:31 EST." <199903170044.TAA16397@cs.rpi.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 00:04:41 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > We have pretty much ruled out everything else. No 2 of the crashes are ever > the same, it is only this machine, and the only difference between this > machine and other machines that are rock solid (48+ days uptime), is that > this machine has the high maxusers. It is required that this machine > has a high maxusers as it is used for shell access for students writing > programs. > > Are there any problems with incorperating Tor's changes into 3.1-STABLE? If > so please speak, as that is exactly what I am doing now. What aspect of "maxusers" is actually required for your students? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message