From owner-freebsd-net Mon Sep 24 19:30:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.14.173.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152DE37B41C for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 71012 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Sep 2001 02:30:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Sep 2001 02:30:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:30:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Cc: Subject: Re: TCP performance question In-Reply-To: <200109250215.LAA00788@const.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp> Message-ID: <20010924212903.H70783-100000@achilles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 tsuchiya@flab.fujitsu.co.jp wrote: > Sorry, it seems it works between two FreeBSD machines. > > I tried to say that it had no effect between FreeBSD4.3 and Solaris, on my > problem. That's what I did previously. > > I found discussion on "delayed ack problem"(January 24 and 25) in this > mailing list. Though still do not understand why delayed_ack=0 does not > work for FreeBSD and Solaris. > > Anyway I appreciate your helping me. > Thank you, > Yoshi If you can reproduce the problem, please take some traces with tcpdump and post them somewhere for public consumption. Perhaps then the problem can be found and fixed. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message