From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 21:45:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05F016A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:45:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from te-clan.ch (ns1.te-clan.ch [217.118.194.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DC6A43D1F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:45:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bachi@te-clan.ch) Received: (qmail 7295 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 21:44:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.10?) (80.219.52.234) by te-clan.ch with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 21:44:17 -0000 From: Andreas Bachmann To: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20050408.104123.78789371.chat95@mac.com> References: <20050408.104123.78789371.chat95@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:45:09 +0200 Message-Id: <1112996709.990.18.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OOO has been updated to m91 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:45:26 -0000 Am Friday, den 08.04.2005, 10:41 +0900 schrieb NAKATA Maho: > kris : could you please test ooo-2.0's buildablity (esp for 5-stable)? compile process completed after 13 hours on a P4M 1.2 GHz... thats long! one problem: segmentation fault in soffice.bin when i start user installation. some directories are created in the user installation process. environment: freebsd 5.3-release gnome 2.10 openoffice.org-1.9m91 are there some similiar examples of don't running openoffice installations? greets Andreas Bachmann