Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 May 2023 16:21:42 +0000
From:      Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org>
To:        Yuri <yuri@aetern.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Error in vm manpage
Message-ID:  <1a48dbcf-71ba-69a0-c010-f16b11d14628@qeng-ho.org>
In-Reply-To: <4763e87b-86bb-8756-4d67-febc6c3d6b04@aetern.org>
References:  <2986dfd0-ac48-9793-f480-84c8e6f4d222@Gmail.com> <f1994bbd-0516-6cf5-13ff-74816bf1620d@qeng-ho.org> <4763e87b-86bb-8756-4d67-febc6c3d6b04@aetern.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/05/2023 15:56, Yuri wrote:
> Arthur Chance wrote:
>> On 06/05/2023 11:25, Steven Friedrich wrote:
>>> In Windows Support section, it mentions uefi-edk2-bhyve port.
>>>
>>> No such port or package exists.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It appears there are two versions
>>
>> sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve-csm
> 
> This one is deprecated.
> 
>> sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve-devel
> 
> This one does not exist since 2021.
> 
> Everything is now in sysutils/edk2 as flavors, e.g. package names will
> currently be:
> 
> edk2-bhyve-g202202_2
> edk2-fvp-g202202_2
> edk2-macchiatobin-g202202_2
> edk2-qemu-x64-g202202_2
> edk2-rpi3-g202202_2
> edk2-rpi4-g202202_2
> edk2-qemu-i386-g202202_2
> edk2-xen-x64-g202202_2
> 

Maybe it's time I regenerated my ports rather than just updating them.
It would appear portsnap doesn't necessarily delete old ports as I have
both ports on my system and my last portsnap update was just after
midnight today.

Also ports.freebsd.org doesn't seem to be up to date on these ports.

-- 
We build our computer systems the way we build our cities; over time,
without a plan, on top of ruins.
			— Ellen Ullman




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1a48dbcf-71ba-69a0-c010-f16b11d14628>