Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 10:43:25 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: More nits Message-ID: <199511020943.KAA25040@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199511020622.WAA02567@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Nov 1, 95 10:22:03 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As David Greenman wrote: > > I think it would be better to add yet another fstab option to specify that > it's okay for it to fail. The offending parition that was so marked would not > cause mount to exit with bad status. Perhaps the option could be called > "optional". This sounds fine to me. Hmm, i tried to look into this, but i cannot fully understand how the MOPT_NOAUTO case is supposed to work. I think, MOPT_OPTIONAL could be implemented in a rather similar way, but i first have to figure out... -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511020943.KAA25040>