From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 4 09:57:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6B1D36 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tamino@wolfhut.org) Received: from pendor.wolfhut.org (pendor.wolfhut.org [173.228.91.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8179999A for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.42.100] (173-228-91-224.static.sonic.net [173.228.91.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pendor.wolfhut.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6414DBB1A; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 01:57:28 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Confused by restore(8) man page example From: Ben Cottrell In-Reply-To: <4861.1362390444@server1.tristatelogic.com> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 01:57:28 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <63618304-837E-4B76-8157-D99C744AC72F@wolfhut.org> References: <4861.1362390444@server1.tristatelogic.com> To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:57:36 -0000 On Mar 4, 2013, at 01:47, "Ronald F. Guilmette" = wrote: > All I see is a pre-existing BSD partition being explicitly newfs'ed = and > then mounted, followed by some stuff being restored to that (clean) > BSD partition from whatever is currently sitting on the tape drive > called /dev/sa0. >=20 > So? What possible problem could derive from merely that? I don't see > any. I guess the same text in the man page could be read several different ways! The way I read it (which may or may not be correct) is that the example given is an example of how to use it *correctly*. It sounds to me like it's warning against deviating too far from the steps given in the example. I can see as how the text might allow other interpretations, though! ~Ben (who is always careful to avoid using out-of-range values with mktime() when setting up lunch with promptness sticklers in Riyadh...)=