From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 4 09:12:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B091B8E for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yan.jurak@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6024E134A for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id dn14so8996174obc.16 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 02:12:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MrREAWY6sN9l8qNR8jh0GUFU55tb++5SwNfNvOvNfn0=; b=MUdC4cQu/zxCTeeR/mBE3VqLJjER6mR9VUdKwqfTWF+k06vCmWzhEeVIzQtwSSqxUx 1UEhmz3/fu71zTJrnNw8kVxnC3ypgrYSqqYXy0OP6vbkLq4M6F5qxpO7RQXhrT2J9oXh 2xtzzjfE3rI2Xp6A1r+Ix+34LRMD2us2z2CQ9meeMfAUsyI1WCZjjWkY0/xTJK8ZI9mj j7dwp3GSLPd8nzzZTpn0ZS9iqKq77WuhbxdbsDhgT93a5UNQRY56RXEzNbXTRybikKI8 n3F91mFOMn2j884bJNh5fLMCsyDifJ3nz7z7ckU7qYhdc2ghUJ3bN/27f0UYZDHyT26b 18vw== X-Received: by 10.182.33.99 with SMTP id q3mr4749219obi.86.1370337170049; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 02:12:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.228.97 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 02:12:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Jan Jurak Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 11:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: headless openjdk To: java@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:12:50 -0000 Hi All, I want to thank to maintainer/s of openjdk port for nice job and want to ask: Do you consider of headless openjdk port? 100% of my installations of OpenJDK on FreeBSD are servers/backend and would be nice if there will be a port of headless opendjk for this purpose. Dependency list will be much shorter for sure. What is Your opinion on this? -- Kind regards Jan Jur=C3=A1k