From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 30 10:29:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C7837B400; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07319; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eAUIT5p30001; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:29:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200011301829.eAUIT5p30001@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Gunnar Flygt , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can this really be true? FreeBSD not working on IBM T20's In-Reply-To: <14886.38595.425732.755712@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <20001130180724.A45345@sr.se> <200011301739.eAUHdjk00582@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <14886.38595.425732.755712@nomad.yogotech.com> Comments: In-reply-to Nate Williams message dated "Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:04:51 -0700." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1504286224P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:29:05 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_1504286224P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I'm going to try to move this to -mobile where it belongs... If memory serves me right, Nate Williams wrote: > > As I read it, some people have had success and others haven't. It's > > difficult to figure out what the problem is, since there are so many > > variables involved and the messages in the thread don't always have the > > details needed to fully analyze the problem. > > I think Ken Key's experience points to it being a partitionID problem, > since he's done the most testing. Ken's messages indicated that he'd tested on the A21P and the T21. In two separate posts, he said that "we have a couple of T20s' [sic] running FreeBSD". I am cautiously optimistic about getting a T20 to work, based on this info, and some email I've exchanged off-list with one of my cow-orkers. This is what I meant by "lots of variables"...one of the problems is that we can't lump all of the "newer generation ThinkPads" together. Bruce. --==_Exmh_1504286224P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6Jpxw2MoxcVugUsMRAqCLAJ9Er9WhdLdWgByv/HY8HweF27EwPACdFpSG sThoeD7z16lICDCT/XXKt4A= =iCJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1504286224P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message