From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 9 21:20:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA14805 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 21:20:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA14776; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 21:20:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA02316; Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:17:41 +1100 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:17:41 +1100 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199803100517.QAA02316@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, jonny@coppe.ufrj.br Subject: Re: *HEADS UP* Correction to previous postings. Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@smith.net.au, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >// User actions in the 3 cases: >// 1. Hope this doesn't happen. It is very unlikely to happen for boot disks. > >Most PC BIOSes (if not all) will not boot from a disk if the first block >does not have the 0xAA55 signature. Indeed, they will not boot without >a valid MBR. The FreeBSD boot blocks can boot from any fd, wd, sd or wfd disk supported by the BIOS. >Have you ever seen such a case ? Or does this discussion apply to I probably have, but don't remember. One of my systems loads the boot blocks from wd0 and the boot blocks the kernel from sd0. sd0 is all-FreeBSD and would work with all-zeros in the MBR. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message