From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 20:37:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A727EA5F; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6BAE8E; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (HSI-KBW-134-3-231-194.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [134.3.231.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A54C861EA; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:37:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <51156220.4040207@bsdforen.de> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:37:52 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130129 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Bumping libreoffice References: <511548F2.4030303@bsdforen.de> <20130208201926.GB55651@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130208203538.GA57852@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20130208203538.GA57852@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:37:54 -0000 On 08/02/2013 21:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:19:27PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:50:26PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>> Please take note of Porters' Handbook section 5.2.2.1. >>> >>> Build fixes are NOT a reason to bump portrevision! >>> >> >> >> Have a look at the history Jung-uk has never done any graticious bump on this >> port. >> >> I personnally resigned on maintaining LibreOffice exactly because of reactions >> like this one, (also because Jung-uk Kim is actually doing a far better job on >> it than me :)). >> >> regards, >> Bapt > > > Sorry I probably over-reacted because I still remember the frustrations from > when I maintained LibreOffice. No, I'm grateful for you telling me that my e-mail was offensive. I'd just like to know how it offended, so that I can avoid this in the future. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?