From owner-freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 10:14:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cvsweb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3880516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 10:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pp.htv.fi (smtp1.pp.htv.fi [212.90.64.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D0A43D3F for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 10:14:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scop@FreeBSD.org) Received: from posti.pp.htv.fi (posti.pp.htv.fi [212.90.64.50]) by smtp1.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963877FFAB for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 20:14:04 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [62.78.130.181] (cs78130181.pp.htv.fi [62.78.130.181]) /8.11.1) with ESMTP id i45HE4h07536 for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 20:14:04 +0300 (EETDST) From: Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?= To: freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <86vfjbqls2.knu@iDaemons.org> References: <86vfjbqls2.knu@iDaemons.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD Message-Id: <1083777243.5261.794.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 20:14:03 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: updating the CVSweb port X-BeenThere: freebsd-cvsweb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS Web maintenance mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 17:14:06 -0000 On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 12:13, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > I think it is time we updated the CVSweb port to CVSweb 3.0.x. Would > you roll a new stable version any time soon? The reason I've been holding 3.0.1 back a bit is that there are some known issues with revision<->branch associations with revision numbers that contain 0's. However, this is a rare situation and is nothing new, that problem has AFAIK always existed. Fixing it seems to be a somewhat tedious job which can be postponed a bit more as far as I'm concerned. I have some trivial CVSHistory integration stuff which should hit CVS really soon now, and I'm fine with pushing 3.0.1 out before the end of this week. Sounds ok? > My plan is to leave devel/cvsweb and add devel/cvsweb3 because CVSweb > 3.0.x requires extra dependencies such as Perl >=5.6 and some library > modules which users may not want to be forced to install. Sounds good to me.