From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 28 14:59: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762C637B405; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:59:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBSMwEc46442; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:58:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200112282258.fBSMwEc46442@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: 4.4-STABLE crashes - suspects new ata-driver over wd-drivers In-Reply-To: <200112282238.fBSMcdb95021@apollo.backplane.com> To: Matthew Dillon Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:58:14 +0100 (CET) Cc: Mike Silbersack , "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" , ian j hart , Matthew Gilbert , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Matthew Dillon wrote: > Note that we aren't complaining about your patch or anything, you > are simply the closest thing we have to a VIA chip expert right now :-) I know, I want to nail this as badly as you guys do, I just want to have the info I use verified before I base any public code on it, either (preferably) by VIA (not very likely though) or by significant testing here in my lab. I do have enogh info to tackle the MVQ bug on the KT133A that we are talining about here though.. Anyways could I have you guys read out all 256 PCI regs from the main chip that is the 0x03051106 one ? -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message