Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:24:53 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: pav@freebsd.org Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@freebsd.org>, "lioux@FreeBSD.org" <lioux@freebsd.org>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, "demon@FreeBSD.org" <demon@freebsd.org>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2) Message-ID: <CACdU%2Bf9BJg%2BPPA%2Bwv_Pk0UNYkPfbjHeZ8Hibj5eWLFc3ff8WtA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1310666060.23182.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <201107121826.00020.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <201107131857.36772.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E1E9C79.6080105@FreeBSD.org> <4E1F200D.1080002@missouri.edu> <1310666060.23182.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/7/14 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith p=ED=B9e v =E8t 14. 07. 2011 v 11:57 -0500: > >> entry. =A0I assume that the filename of the desktop entry is unimportant= , > > The filename of desktop entry should be 100% inconsequential, and our > only care should be not have two ports installing same file. > >> and is used only internally by Gnome or whatever. > > Sounds like a bug to me. > >> But maybe it would have been better to have had one more entry in >> DESKTOP_ENTRIES that was the actual filename of the desktop entry. > > Yes, but is it worth the effort? Note you'll have to introduce it > somehow not to break existing ports. > How about something like this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D158936 Scot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf9BJg%2BPPA%2Bwv_Pk0UNYkPfbjHeZ8Hibj5eWLFc3ff8WtA>