Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 10:46:09 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ideas from netbsd Message-ID: <199511081746.KAA20352@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199511080608.XAA28061@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Nov 7, 95 11:08:34 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That's all. VM86() code is your holy grail, and you are using it to
> make points that aren't relevant to it. I'm trying to inject a little
> bit of factual information into the discussion to bring out the fact
> that VM86() is *still* non-trivial to do, even given the NetBSD code.
> {Especially for a non-kernel weenie like myself}
The point I'm making is that NetBSD should be leveraged where possible
to make support less non-trivial. If this means a COMPAT_NETBSD, then
all the better.
Terry Lambert
terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511081746.KAA20352>