From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 9 09:16:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA18764 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.iafrica.com (chain.iafrica.com [196.31.1.66]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA18756 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 09:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (khetan@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chain.iafrica.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA28186; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:12:12 +0200 (SAT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:12:09 +0200 (SAT) From: Khetan Gajjar To: James Raynard cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: after 2.1.5 releases In-Reply-To: <199607081252.MAA01173@jraynard.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 8 Jul 1996, James Raynard wrote: >If you're planning to follow -current and future versions of FreeBSD >then I would recommend hanging on to it :-) Ok - this I knew before hand. >There is no separate tree for -current and -stable - they are I thought so. Just wanted to confirm! >development and has basically been a tremendous pain in the tonsils, And elsewhere >which is why -stable is going away. Aha. Regards, Khetan Gajjar. --- http://www.chain.iafrica.com/~khetan/ UUNet-Internet Africa Operations - 0800-030-002