From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 02:19:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4E7106564A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sinkeyteck@yahoo.com) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2627D8FC19 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sedev.central.corp.tw1.yahoo.com (sedev.central.corp.tw1.yahoo.com [10.82.41.163]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q212977T061331 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:09:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ktsin@localhost) by sedev.central.corp.tw1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id pAK4DWi9020613; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:13:32 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from sinkeyteck@yahoo.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sedev.central.corp.tw1.yahoo.com: ktsin set sender to sinkeyteck@yahoo.com using -f From: KT Sin To: Tomasz Kowalczyk Message-ID: <20111120041332.GA20467@sedev.central.corp.tw1.yahoo.com> References: <20111119105155.GA1330@wolfman.devio.us> <201111191438.18121.kowalczt@gmail.com> <20111119170533.GT50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201111191853.27495.kowalczt@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201111191853.27495.kowalczt@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel driver patch 11.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:19:53 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:13:32 +0800 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:19:53 -0000 been seeing rejects for i915 too. can you please share with us your workaround? On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 06:53:27PM +0100, Tomasz Kowalczyk wrote: > On Saturday 19 of November 2011 18:05:33 Kostik Belousov wrote: > > The latest version of the patch is always for latest _HEAD_. > > I have no intent or spare cycles to maintain the backport to 9. > > Since there are some bits of VM infrastructure that finally got > > committed to HEAD, they are removed from the patch. It means that > > current patch set is not usable on 9 at all. > > Thanks for clarifying that. I don't track changes in HEAD that much and didn't > know that. Before patch 11.0 i used 9.0-rc, but now I switched to current, so > its working almost untouched(almost ,becouse yesterday i had some rejects from > i915_suspend.c on 12.1.patch, on fresh current sources ;p, but i managed to do > workaround). > And for today update of xf86-video-intel-kms to 2.17, my box works just good. > Before that when i was enabling compositing in kde, X sometimes was hanging in > edid recheck loop, which caused very big cpu usage. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"