From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 18 8:40: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49E937B565 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA68025; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 08:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004181540.IAA68025@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Alexander Langer Subject: Re: ports/18075: New version of unzip - 5.41 Reply-To: Alexander Langer Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/18075; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Langer To: Dominic Mitchell Cc: dom@palmerharvey.co.uk, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/18075: New version of unzip - 5.41 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:30:14 +0200 Thus spake Dominic Mitchell (Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk): > I don't know. Now that encryption is part of the base port, it might be > a better idea to can the unzip.with_encryption port instead. This > probably needs to be fleshed out on the ports mailing list (cc'd). Is the encryption export-restricted in any way? If not, I see no reason why to keep the unzip.with-encryption port any longer. But I see RESTRICTED= "This program can't be imported/re-exported from USA" in the encrypted port. (what I no wonder is - why do I have this port installed?) Alex -- I need a new ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message