Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 16:49:58 +0100 (BST) From: Paul Richards <paul@netcraft.co.uk> To: pete@sms.fi (Petri Helenius) Cc: davidg@Root.COM, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Which SUP files are available and where ? Message-ID: <199509161549.QAA02952@server.netcraft.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199509160845.LAA24544@silver.sms.fi> from "Petri Helenius" at Sep 16, 95 11:45:02 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Petri Helenius who said > > David Greenman writes: > > > > > > Ok, if this is the general consensus, when will 2.1 be available? > > > > "Soon". It's looking very good indeed. > > > > -DG > > Will there be 2.2-STABLE and 2.3-CURRENT after the 2.1-RELEASE happens? > I'm for this because I see it very valuable to have two branches of code > in addition to releases. -STABLE has proven it's right to exist, IMO. > Me too. I know it's more work for David (or someone anyway) but it allows bug smashing to be done over a longer period and also, I'm running some critical machines now and the sig 11 problem would have floored me but I'm happy to run -stable branches and put up with occasional glitches. It means we can run the next potential release in real environemnts for longer periods than we have in the past. -- Paul Richards, Netcraft Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509161549.QAA02952>