From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 26 14:09:15 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10B71065670
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it)
Received: from cp-out2.libero.it (cp-out2.libero.it [212.52.84.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9808FC18
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it)
Received: from libero.it (192.168.17.14) by cp-out2.libero.it (8.5.107)
	id 4A65D446003CB41C; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:09:14 +0200
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:09:14 +0200
Message-Id: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sensitivity: 3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: "barbara" <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it>
To: "glen\.j\.barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>
X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.3 (R1) (B3pl25)
X-SenderIP: 87.20.218.25
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:09:15 -0000

> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, barbara<barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> wro=
te:
> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, barbara<barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> =
wrote:
> >> > Why portsnap doesn't provide INDEX-8?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi, Barbara
> >>
> >> They appear on my machine:
> >>
> >> %ls /usr/ports/INDEX-*
> >> /usr/ports/INDEX-5 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/INDEX-7 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/por=
ts/INDEX-8.bz2
> >> /usr/ports/INDEX-6 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/INDEX-8
> >
> > If you remove them, you will see that INDEX-8 is missing.
> > Also check the dates of the files.
> > This will make portversion misbehave.
> >
> 
> I believe that is true with anything in ${PORTSDIR} -- if you remove a
> ${CATEGORY}/${PORT}, it will not be replaced through portsnap.  I am
> not sure if this is true for c(v)sup, as I don't use it for my ports
> tree, but I expect it would restore the missing directory/files/etc.
> 

If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will f=
ind only fresh INDEX-[5-7].
Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, b=
ut I really don't know.

Barbara