From owner-freebsd-cluster Mon Jul 15 2:16:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948DA37B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.nentec.de (gate2.nentec.de [194.25.215.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C110943E6E for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sporner@nentec.de) Received: from nenny.nentec.de (root@nenny.nentec.de [153.92.64.1]) by gate.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g6F9GWA00815; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:32 +0200 Received: from nentec.de (andromeda.nentec.de [153.92.64.34]) by nenny.nentec.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g6F9GUZ23387; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:30 +0200 Message-ID: <3D3292ED.3010009@nentec.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:29 +0200 From: Andy Sporner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Lasse L. Johnsen" Cc: Amar Takhar , freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting References: <20020709195436.95062.qmail@web20709.mail.yahoo.com> <20020715084209.GA21007@drunkmonk.net> <1026723461.3d328e85e34e6@www.freebsdcluster.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG OK, I am going to make the suggestion that we go ahead as we had originally planned and make use of the work that Amar had started. It is probably a good idea to put a home page on SF for those who might be interested in this go find us. Amar, why not check the current (what you did to fix the TK/BLT thing in). Derek, what were the specific changes in V-212 that are posted on Chris's website? We need to get them rolled into Amar's changes. Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe in this case that 'no news is good news' ;-) Andy Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: >Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot more useful >than Sourceforge will in the short term. > >/Lasse > >Quoting Amar Takhar : > >>On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: >> >>>Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org >>>to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from >>>what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but >>>discounted, what were the issues? >>> >>Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have >>our >>own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why we >>would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. >> >>Amar. >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message >> > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message