Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 22:16:06 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: phk@critter.tfs.com, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org, isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSD networking code guru needed? Message-ID: <199512212116.WAA15862@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199512211610.JAA02765@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Dec 21, 95 09:10:36 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Nate Williams wrote: > > > > I've been noticing this yesterday, too. Garrett solved the problem > > > for the non proxy-arp case right before 2.1 (where a clone route has > > > been allocated through the default route, pointing to the ethernet > > > interface), but this one here is still broken. > > Umm, I'm not seeing that fix on my 2.1 box (which is running post 2.1 > stuff including fixes that came in after the fact), and I don't remember > the fix going in. I just perused the commitlog file and I'm not seeing > any 'arp' fix, although I'm looking at the clone route stuff. No, it is entirely unrelated with arp. I meant the fix from sys/net/route.c rev 1.26. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512212116.WAA15862>