From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 16 10:59:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F44437B401
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from metafocus.net (cbshost-12-155-142-123.sbcox.net
	[12.155.142.123])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7166D43F93
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mudman@metafocus.net)
Received: from metafocus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by metafocus.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GI32Wx011621
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mudman@metafocus.net)
Received: from localhost (mudman@localhost)
	by metafocus.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id h5GI32Dq011618
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave <mudman@metafocus.net>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030616105955.U11598@metafocus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: POP daemon
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:59:56 -0000


What would be a good POP daemon to use?  I know there are a few in the
mail ports.  Are they any good?

What I mean by good is 'secure as possible' (is there really such thing as
being totally secure / invulnerable?)

Cheers