From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 13:32:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6169B2CEB for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D76B13C5 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from [84.44.210.35] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMFq7-0006s2-9r; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:31:39 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:31:38 +0200 From: Fabian Keil To: Konstantin Belousov Cc: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r286223 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs Message-ID: <4b278e01.11dc4bd9@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <20150803120359.GC2072@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201508030934.t739YAkT026668@repo.freebsd.org> <20150803094730.GA24698@zxy.spb.ru> <55BF431E.3020601@freebsd.org> <2757800.HIDNx1G49O@overcee.wemm.org> <20150803111942.GB2072@kib.kiev.ua> <55BF557B.60009@multiplay.co.uk> <20150803120359.GC2072@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:32:54 -0000 --Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > > For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,= =20 > > which can be done later, just > > to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could=20 > > cause a panic. >=20 > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs > threads do request larger stack size, I know this. >=20 > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which > does not boot ? Will do. Fabian --Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlW/bToACgkQBYqIVf93VJ2HrQCfVu+06/iS6s3+AUsAGCbaENnr +tsAoK5glCAgz5o3aM2q9Jyk5X9edAPB =qiKs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt--