Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:20:07 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port Spamassassin-2.64---> 3.0.0 Message-ID: <20040925162007.GA870@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <E62EFEC57397FB69D214E5CB@cc-147.int.t-online.fr> References: <GJENLKEBMBFGINPDCHJKEEANDNAA.jack@antennex.com> <E62EFEC57397FB69D214E5CB@cc-147.int.t-online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Mathieu, On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:29:15PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 24/09/2004 12:37 -0500, Jack L. Stone ?crivait : > | I was wondering when the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port will be updated to t= he > | new release? > | Spamassassin-2.64---> 3.0.0...?? >=20 > I've made a patch available at : > <http://people.freebsd.org/~mat/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.0.diff>; > it lacks SSL support for spamc/spamd, but I'll do that on Monday. Wow, this is great! Thanks! In addition, it seems that both SpamAssassin and OpenBSD-spamd is sharing a script with name 'spamd.sh' in PREFIX/etc/rc.d. I think it might be good if both changed their names into another scheme, for example: spamd.sh (SpamAssassin) -> spamassassin-spamd.sh spamd.sh (OpenBSD) -> pf-spamd.sh What do you think about this issue? IIRC cyrus-imapd2 and postfix has similiar problem... Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFBVZq3/cVsHxFZiIoRAkntAJd3PpB8ksRu+VpHfBY4xp8L9FPdAJwNLAkJ x57H+nJl4owhVx3ZP1Tjbg== =Pdu4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040925162007.GA870>