From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Apr  8 11:24:51 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA20077
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 11:24:51 -0700
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA20067
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 11:24:47 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.10) id MAA24432; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 12:28:41 -0600
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 12:28:41 -0600
Message-Id: <199504081828.MAA24432@trout.sri.MT.net>
To: Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Cc: FREEBSD-CURRENT-L <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: man(1) bug
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950409020812.2012B-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
References: <199504081724.LAA23173@trout.sri.MT.net>
	<Pine.BSI.3.91.950409020812.2012B-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
Reply-To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ problems with GNU-man in our src tree ]

> > I don't necessarily agree with it, but that's irrelevant.  We need to
> > fix the problem since they aren't going to.
> 
>     I think I might be able to handle this one (but knowing GNU
> code...).  Should I be subscribed to the commits list for doing this
> type of stuff?

You should be subscribed to the commit lists if you are running -current
code in any case, but I suppose so.  I suspect it's not critical since I
doubt anyone else will work on it anytime in the near future, but just
in case it's probably a good idea.


Nate