From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 02:21:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3DE16A4CE for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:21:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.tpgi.com.au (mail.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C093243D39 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 02:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from agh@tpg.com.au) Received: from 192.168.0.2 (220-244-72-6.tpgi.com.au [220.244.72.6]) by mail3.tpgi.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBFALbS00804; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:21:38 +1100 From: "Alastair G. Hogge" To: John-Mark Gurney Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:21:54 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200311102002.44260.agh@tpg.com.au> <20031203231419.GF54398@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031203231419.GF54398@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312152121.54259.agh@tpg.com.au> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vm_fault on umass transfers X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:21:45 -0000 On Thursday, 04 December 2003 10:14, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Alastair G. Hogge wrote this message on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 20:02 +1100: > > I've had an Olympus camera which I've been able to access under -CURRENT > > for some time until recently. I can mount_msdosfs the device (da0s1) OK, > > but when I try to copy or move files from the device to my hard disk > > drive I get the following kernel message: > > panic: mv_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: dc346000 > > > > And then the system will start to shutdown and sync disks. > > > > Unfortunately I've been unable to boot with a generic kernel at this > > stage to see if there would be more information spat out. > > Sorry for the long delay, finally getting to the -current list after a > trip. > > Is this on ochi? There was a patch that might have fixed thigh committed > recently. Is this still reproducable on -current? OK. Looks like a recent -CURRENT solves the problem