From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 3 17:52:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717C016A41F for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:52:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7FF43D46 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so291752nzd for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:52:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jWRdbifHrdNYZdCirFeWCebW62SP09WoM+Pl+XT2PmScHFC2yzGSnGFO1VryhArCroiukewHCpqUIA2MtJYMJb0+5KfnJJ7Qzv34CV2JnOHyn0K29qWNuE/CDWwHBywmlIDpkHtaWxtRpO9SkVeB7nP2vTThSpWtksZOZ8Nwcq4= Received: by 10.36.58.11 with SMTP id g11mr387754nza; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.20.34 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 21:52:33 +0400 From: "Andrew P." To: Dinesh Nair In-Reply-To: <4341400E.5040706@alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1102494183.41b6b9e726b2f@www.domainfactory-webmail.de> <433D3C12.6020104@axis.nl> <4341400E.5040706@alphaque.com> Cc: Olaf Greve , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which MySQL version best to use and with/without linux threads? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrew P." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:52:34 -0000 On 10/3/05, Dinesh Nair wrote: > On 10/01/05 00:08 Andrew P. said the following: > > linuxthreads were only important on FreeBSD 4.x. > > Starting with 5.x we have a more efficient threading > > model. Extensive testing did not reveal any significant > > is this definitive, i.e. that on 5.x linuxthreads are worse off than nati= ve > freebsd threads ? i'm not trying to be a troll, but over on the asterisk > mailing lists, we're in the midst of discussing if /usr/ports/net/asteris= k > should be using linuxthreads or pthreads by default. on 4.x (which i'm > still on), linuxthreads has oodles better performance than native pthread= s, > but i havent really done any testing on 5.x or 6.x. > > any advice here would be much appreciated. > > -- > Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." > dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ > +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D----oOO--(_)--OOo----=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ > | for a in past present future; do = | > | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do = | > | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." = | > | done; done = | > +=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D+ > Yes, it's definitely so. Google for a few minutes and you'll see it for yourself. Stick with native threads.