Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:28:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Sergey Babkin <babkin@verizon.net> To: Sergey Babkin <babkin@verizon.net>, Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Proposal: a revoke() system call Message-ID: <22302744.211651215451685258.JavaMail.root@vms227.mailsrvcs.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> My thinking has been that if close() wakes them up, then things would be >> inherited from there. The thing I didn't know is that apparently in many cases close() >> doesn't wake them up. >> >> -SB >> > >In cases where I need to wake the select() up immediately for cases such >as this, I've implemented a "trigger pipe" that I include on the select >list. This is a simple pipe, that is written to by the application in Yep, This is the design I'm trying to avoid :-) -SB
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22302744.211651215451685258.JavaMail.root>