Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:18:35 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "swap" partition leads to instability? Message-ID: <20130530221835.080f0d98@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK106Fu0dKmR-4_e3ZjnjoMb3ZrjWEscXX99v1qj4BzCJw@mail.gmail.com> References: <1369558712.96152.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20130526160906.4e379016@X220.ovitrap.com> <20130526113235.f5dbe768.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305261724050.29348@wonkity.com> <CA%2BtpaK106Fu0dKmR-4_e3ZjnjoMb3ZrjWEscXX99v1qj4BzCJw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 May 2013 18:48:18 -0500 Adam Vande More wrote: > Um, that is wrong. It is in fact the basically the point of TRIM. > And SSD's typically use the best form of wear leveling and it's > usually advisable to leave a bit of the drive unpartitioned/unused to > ensure the wear leveling works optimally. Would the UFS default 8% reserve achieve that?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130530221835.080f0d98>