From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 08:23:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B998A106568E; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lothar@lobraun.de) Received: from smtp.cs.uni-tuebingen.de (u-173-c156.cs.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.173.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EC08FC19; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lothar@lobraun.de) Received: from u-172-c158.cs.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.172.158]) by smtp.cs.uni-tuebingen.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KEJjS-0000Bm-Js; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:59:58 +0200 Message-ID: <486C8700.5020100@lobraun.de> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:00:00 +0200 From: Lothar Braun User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org References: <784966050807021123l267aa20en39eb513c12c90ad2@mail.gmail.com> <20080702235800.H47773@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20080702235800.H47773@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sysinstall is still inadequate after all of these years X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:23:09 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > My > primary concern about some of these replacement installer projects is > that they've placed a strong focus on making them graphical -- I > actually couldn't care less about GUIs (and I think they actually hurt > my configurations, since I use serial consoles a lot), but what I do > want is a very tight and efficient install process, which I feel > sysinstall does badly on (not just for the reasons you specify). Hmm, how should a tight and efficient installation process look like in your opinion? And what are the other points that are bad in systinstall? Regards, Lothar