From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan 30 17:37:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA17153
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:37:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17148
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 17:36:57 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA23050;
	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 01:36:47 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id CAA06527;
	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:36:41 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <19980131023641.18792@follo.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:36:41 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: LFS is nuked?
References: <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e
In-Reply-To: <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 08:08:32PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current"

On Fri, Jan 30, 1998 at 08:08:32PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> said:
> 
> > Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's
> > bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and
> > X.25 code have all been fixed...
> 
> But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to
> real users.

Hey!  I'm probably going to have to either revive X.25 or drop a project, as
TCP/IP over the ISDN D-channel is supposedly implemented encapsulated in
X.25.

This isn't an active project right now, but it is on my official TODO-list
at work.  If X.25 networking had been functional in FreeBSD, it would've
been higher on the list.

Eivind, not a "real user" ;-)