From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 30 17:02:25 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFA4106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tjg@soe.ucsc.edu)
Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.32])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DAA8FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu [128.114.48.32])
	by mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BC31008255;
	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tim Gustafson <tjg@soe.ucsc.edu>
To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Message-ID: <1832862951.338331277917345049.JavaMail.root@mail-01.cse.ucsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4C2B747E.3060500@infracaninophile.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [128.114.49.22]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.20_GA_3127.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0
	([unknown])/5.0.20_GA_3127.RHEL5_64)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fusefs-cryptofs vs fusefs-cryptofs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:02:25 -0000

> On FreeBSD, this is spelled GELI (or GBDE, but I think geli is
> slightly better).  Native filesystem level encryption -- rather
> more efficient than something like fuse, needs no extra software
> installed, very secure.

Sorry, I should have been more specific:

This is in the context of a jailed system.  So, the encrypted file system must be creatable, configurable, mountable and unmountable entirely from within a jail.

Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
tjg@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354