From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 10:10:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346861065673; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1EA8FC18; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA1CE902C; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:10:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=subject :from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=YszGdAjTx2SU XV/G8EmKWJdk8IE=; b=QjSbtVPc7YYoNQUSqvesmYljMAo+B3i+pjJbHZ+gOvor fymz6AvHGkx2e8GdWWbjYgr1OWiFUKv8lBRZkYJKHARTYxRApk+452AKTPoazAST tGALEPjucgavk6Bd0iDUXrqMyQ+wWkw3kKpiHgFudkTI7tkZLCxWPQ41sAmJu3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=subject:from :to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=BwFk1J SkAAkGbV+LWaA4cO51+rR5n+L/5ohbycBwUvOmNhRnb5ZTbiMj3SVVX1vJgfwBq2 CmDbVmShe5Zuzm24w/Nds3FKnjKHXKcrD9q//69oKcDIlfOh5s02fbMO65nW0u4e LLVfB3mHhDfDU0DYtiLTSeUOFqqVQyi6wQ1TM= Received: from [192.168.0.10] (client-86-31-236-253.oxfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.31.236.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75232E902B; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:10:49 +0000 (GMT) From: Bruce Cran To: Rob Farmer In-Reply-To: References: <201102281003.p1SA3mfl032937@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:10:22 +0000 Message-ID: <1298974222.2888.13.camel@core.nessbank> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Bruce Cran Subject: Re: svn commit: r219096 - in head: lib/libc/yp lib/libelf share/man/man7 sys/boot/i386/cdboot sys/boot/pc98/cdboot usr.bin/checknr X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:10:51 -0000 On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 19:07 -0800, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > Author: brucec > > Date: Mon Feb 28 10:03:48 2011 > > New Revision: 219096 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219096 > > > > Log: > > Revert some of r177626. "in in" is valid in certain sentences. > > I disagree. "in in" (or any doubled word) looks awkward in print and > should be avoided. Even if its grammatically correct, its a style > problem because the reader has to do a double take and starts to > wonder about the quality of the writing. With the exception of the > security manpage, where "break in originally" or similar would work, > these are all unnecessary verbosity and should be cut. So you actually agree with me that it's valid grammatically :) I'll commit the changes you suggested. -- Bruce Cran