From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 19 2:52:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552FE152CC for ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 02:52:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9301C6D; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:52:34 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Alex Zepeda Cc: Warner Losh , Andreas Klemm , David Greenman , Matthew Dillon , Sean Eric Fagan , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH for testing In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:31:58 PST." Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:52:34 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19991119105234.EE9301C6D@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message Alex Zepeda w rites: > > : ps -e w/out -U only shows variables for processes owned by that user, no? > > > > ps -ea. > > Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled? *grin* I can't believe this is still being discussed! This was "fixed" two days ago so that 'ps -e' by a normal user can only see the environment of processes that they own.. No matter whether they use -a, -U, etc. Root can (of course) still see the environment of all processes. -stable is a different matter. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message