From owner-freebsd-java Wed Nov 17 11:28: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from sith.wlcg.com (209-9-101-127.sdsl.cais.net [209.9.101.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED7014A24 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:28:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@wlcg.com) Received: from localhost (joe@localhost) by sith.wlcg.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) with SMTP id OAA05415; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:30:54 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: sith.wlcg.com: joe owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:30:54 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Yandle To: chris@tourneyland.com Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of JDK for FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <19991117191142.4078.rocketmail@web903.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Or we might get severly flamed for being offtopic... > > On questions, sure. But on advocacy and isp? Actually, > I'd think the people on questions would be interested > in helping Sun support Java on FreeBSD, even if they > aren't active in Java and aren't on the Java list. Now that I think about it, you're right, we'd probably be okay on advocacy and isp. > Would a "Sorry if this is off-topic, but we're trying > to get Sun to be more supportive in porting Java to > FreeBSD . . ." posting really anger anyone? > If anyone here is on one of those lists, I say go ahead and post. I'm not sure about the setup, but majordomo will probably bounce any posts that don't come from list members. Joe Yandle Internet Programmer Westlake Consulting Group To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message