From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 00:10:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D262916A420; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111F443D45; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id md50002341029.msg; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:09:54 +0000 Message-ID: <00e401c63d8d$9fb54d20$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Mikhail Teterin" References: <200603010505.k2155HfQ003205@aldan.algebra.com> <200603011634.19617.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <007c01c63d86$7bff2ab0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <200603011904.43830.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:09:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-u"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:09:54 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:09:56 +0000 Cc: sos@freebsd.org, "Mikhail T." , Julian Elischer , Brian Candler , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:10:19 -0000 I think one of us misunderstood. I mean when you created the array setting the block size there to different values. Not the block size ( bs= ) to dd. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mikhail Teterin" середа 01 березень 2006 18:18, Steven Hartland Ви написали: > Have you tried changing the block size? Changing here increased > from 8Mb/s -> 150Mb/s iirc when moving to the lowest available > block size option. Yes, I have. From my earlier e-mail in this thread (Message-Id <200603011107.09942@aldan>): dd of=/dev/ad8 if=/dev/zero bs=1m 631242752 bytes transferred in 91.039066 secs (6933757 bytes/sec) ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.