From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Aug 22 7:11: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C01D37B400 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 07:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy.centtech.com (moat.centtech.com [206.196.95.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F05C43E77 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 07:11:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from sprint.centtech.com (sprint.centtech.com [10.177.173.31]) by proxy.centtech.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MEB2Y01978; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:11:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by sprint.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id g7MEB2p19495; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:11:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from centtech.com (proton [10.177.173.77]) by sprint.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MEAxo19477; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:10:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3D64F0F2.7080304@centtech.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:10:58 -0500 From: Eric Anderson Reply-To: anderson@centtech.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: friar_josh@webwarrior.net Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/41865: [PATCH] XFree86 section should document -nolisten tcp option in startx References: <200208221240.g7MCe7eB007052@freefall.freebsd.org> <3D64E095.6050001@centtech.com> <1030005394.226.23.camel@markx.vladsempire.net> <3D64EBE5.5090501@centtech.com> <1030006504.226.27.camel@markx.vladsempire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 13:49, Eric Anderson wrote: > >>I don't recall ever seeing it in 4.5-RELEASE. Only with XFree86 4.x have I seen >>it (on FreeBSD). 4.5-RELEASE defaulted to XFree86 3.3.6, and never had the >>problem unless you installed XFree86 4.x over it. >> >>I missed the documentation on that, my bad. However, when you do an upgrade >>(binary) of a box, and something like remote X displays stop working, the first >>thing that crosses your mind is "something is broken", not "I should check the >>man pages for XFree86, startx, xinit, [insert your wm here], [insert your >>favorite remote shell program (ie. ssh, rsh, telnet, etc) here], etc". I hit >>this problem a long time ago putting XFree86 4.2 on a 4.5-RELEASE machine, so it >>seemed like nothing to me. Only until yesterday when I received a few emails >>from friends (who now use FreeBSD like it's a drug) asking how to fix it, did it >>occur to me that there should be more docs on it - they checked the handbook, >>FAQ, and a few newsgroups - with no good answers. >> >>Eric >> > > Top posting makes mail threads hard to follow. > > I agree with you completely, but my point still stands. The issue is > with what version of XFree86 you are running. It's not really tied to > what version of FreeBSD you are running very tightly. If you are going > to make a FAQ entry you should include the version numbers of X where > the change occured. > > Josh Right, that is the issue, but since FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE and newer all come with XFree86 4.x as the default X install now, and an upgrade makes the problem appear, then it is tied to FreeBSD, although not completely. If all you're trying to say is "hey, add the versions of XFree86 in the diff", then submit a quick followup to the PR, or I can. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology The moon may be smaller than Earth, but it's further away. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message