From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 03:36:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4FE1065674 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org) Received: from ourbrains.org (li48-221.members.linode.com [66.246.76.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52FBC8FC1B for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org) Received: (qmail 13630 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Nov 2008 03:36:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:36:24 -0500 From: Dan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081116033624.GA13618@ourbrains.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20081110110805.GK1302@obspm.fr> <20081110161002.GA81960@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20081110203643.GH27646@obspm.fr> <200811102235.46971.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4ad871310811101530p7b2baa0fk7f7b5118e314c11d@mail.gmail.com> <4918CE42.3050504@ccstores.com> <20081115061957.GA10998@ourbrains.org> <20081116023239.GA89267@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081116023239.GA89267@icarus.home.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: root /etc/csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:36:04 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick(koitsu@FreeBSD.org)@2008.11.15 18:32:39 -0800: > > Problem solved. Why doesn't FreeBSD ship bash and other shells besides > > the `sh' linked statically is beyond me. It wouldn't break ports, would > > it? > > It does break ports. Very, very badly. I know because I've personally > attempted replacing /bin/sh with bash as a "I have a weekend to spare" > project. You misunderstand. I do not suggest replacing the standard shell with bash, I suggest that the shells available in FreeBSD, even through ports to be linked statically so they can be used for rescue and recovery. If the default make instructions told to compile statically, it wouldn't break the ports.