From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec 19 15:21:27 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA19542
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA19532
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA07830; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:19:56 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: rminnich@Sarnoff.COM (Ron G. Minnich), freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rpc.lockd in nfs in freebsd vs. sun nfs locking 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Dec 1996 14:53:00 MST."
             <199612192153.OAA12245@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 15:19:55 -0800
Message-ID: <7826.851037595@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> No, it's not locking.  That was Jordan's class project: to integrate
> my patches and maintain a flatened lock graph in the rpc.lockd code
> (ie: he intended to un-stub the code and collapse multipl open file
> references to a single lockd descriptor).

And one of the reasons I dropped that class - I looked at the problem
and decided that did *not* want to become Mr. Rpc.lockd. :-)

						Jordan