From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Nov 28 0:31:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBC937B404 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eAS8ViQ60157; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:31:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id BAA09037; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:31:44 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011280831.BAA09037@harmony.village.org> To: Scott Augustus Subject: Re: Recommended ethernet pccard for 4.2 Cc: "Greg Smith" , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:19:34 EST." <4.3.2.20001125101528.00c75b90@pophost> References: <4.3.2.20001125101528.00c75b90@pophost> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:31:43 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <4.3.2.20001125101528.00c75b90@pophost> Scott Augustus writes: : At 10:47 PM 11/24/00 +0000, Greg Smith wrote: : >I have had good luck with a 3Com 3C589D and also with a Linksys EC2T. : : I recall reading a few rumblings somewhere that the 3c589d works but there : are numerous incidents with substantial packet loss. Interestingly, a : co-worker in Atlanta complained of the same thing to me. Anyone experience : that? I use the 589d all the time. I mean that literally. It works very well. The only time you'll have substaitial packet loss is when the IRQ is badly configured. At least that's been the case in every single case I've investigated. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message