From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 22 03:08:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B4916A420 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:08:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203D943D46 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:08:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B1D1A3C25; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:08:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 346B1517D5; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:08:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:08:10 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Mars G. Miro" Message-ID: <20060222030810.GA75798@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <28edec3c0602211753p7290e85q3fb23d799c0cf0fc@mail.gmail.com> <20060222015924.GA74781@xor.obsecurity.org> <28edec3c0602211901j63066e01te585c12a42057d1e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28edec3c0602211901j63066e01te585c12a42057d1e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: linprocfs and linux_base port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:08:14 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:01:57AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote: > > No, it's because it tried and failed to umount linprocfs. Presumably > > you didnt have linprocfs mounted in your jail, but some packages >=20 > Well mounting/unmounting stuff inside the jail is a pain. I now recall > I had to mount linprocfs from the host to the jail, thus I was able to > build them. Hrm, perhaps its time for jail__linprocfs_enable > (as with devfs inside a jail) ... I think you're missing my point: if you don't have linprocfs mounted, ports like jdk will fail. If you do have it mounted, ports like linux_base will fail [because they need to umount it and remount it]. The latter should be fixed so that you can consistently set up a jail and have it work in both cases. Kris --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD+9WaWry0BWjoQKURAmfRAJ9m+TbblEePM4L2w73ksi7rzjuk4wCcDCD5 4cFR2+3rsp91vF3MUAEZby8= =1/eF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--