From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org  Tue Aug 16 13:48:24 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4425BBBBC8A
 for <freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:48:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from cu01176a.smtpx.saremail.com (cu01176a.smtpx.saremail.com
 [195.16.150.151])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A21180F
 for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from [172.16.8.36] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11])
 by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1727F9DC8A2;
 Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Is it me or is FreeBSD slower on Xen than Linux?
From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
In-Reply-To: <8521aebaa093bcefe5956a71fd879140@ultra-secure.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:48:14 +0200
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
 freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <872C5626-F58D-4F84-92AC-88B7352D1DDF@sarenet.es>
References: <b0fdde5d7abf905ca6dfd176f028332e@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160816085455.46a5slqsbgauod5t@mac>
 <2a0a5ae2821551935de329b8665834be@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160816100605.la63x2ju5bmtdqhl@mac>
 <e62d4e94ec36fa859783ddc0aeb1aa28@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160816110759.6xlvxikw3tziahfd@mac>
 <c3a3a7da26cd1a6a114c03e823926272@ultra-secure.de>
 <20160816132938.d2i4u2y3scpzi2et@mac>
 <00D22384-BAA7-42E4-A486-4BE07562D011@sarenet.es>
 <8521aebaa093bcefe5956a71fd879140@ultra-secure.de>
To: rainer@ultra-secure.de
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:48:24 -0000


> On 16 Aug 2016, at 15:41, rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote:
>=20
> Am 2016-08-16 15:38, schrieb Borja Marcos:
>>=20
>> Maybe this is too obvious, my apologies in that case. But, how have
>> the filesystems been
>> created and mounted? Asynchronous? Synchronous? Journalling?
>> Softupdates in the case of
>> FreeBSD UFS? It can make quite a difference.
>=20
>=20
> FreeBSD
>=20
> /dev/ada2p1 on /home/db (ufs, local, soft-updates)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Linux:
> /dev/mapper/system-lvm--home /home           ext4    defaults        0 =
      2
>=20
>=20
> What does "defaults" mean, BTW?

That=E2=80=99s the mother of the lamb, we use to say in Spain ;)

I guess it depends on the particular distribution, not just on being =
ext4. Is there a tool similar to
dumpfs on Linux?=20

You can also experiment with the FreeBSD options, maybe it will be a =
quicker route. Try to mount as asynchronous.
In case it  makes a big difference, you got it.





Borja.