Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 02:40:53 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes Message-ID: <400DD8A5.9050802@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040121013426.GB22773@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <1074617147.757.16.camel@gyros> <400D6379.5010602@ciam.ru> <20040121013426.GB22773@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:20:57PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > >>Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> >>>>>Type: FEATURE >>>>> >>>>>Title: Add per-port persistent build options with a menu-driven >>>>>front-end >> >>[snipped] >> >>>>>PR: >>>>> >>>>>Submitted by: eivind >> >>[snipped] >> >>>What's the general consensus on this (is there one)? What about ports >> >>Sadly, we've seen no PR before and couldn't discuss it. > > > It's been discussed off and on for several years. There were a couple > of prototypes developed, all of which had various problems, including > a prototype I wrote. Eivind did some more work on my code (and his > initial version also had problems, as I recall), but I assume they > were all cleaned up in the version that was committed. > > Kris It is great to *finally* see something that works. I t would be perfect with persistend non-yes-no-options ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?400DD8A5.9050802>