From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 13 14:40:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A7E37B41D; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from levais.imp.ch (levais.imp.ch [157.161.4.66]) by mail.imp.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2DMeXA00757; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:40:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:42:46 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Jan Stocker , , , Subject: Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT In-Reply-To: <20020313141149.A7104@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20020313233931.O7707-100000@levais.imp.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Kris, > Did you pursue my suggestion of comparing recent patches in the port > and in the source tree? Easy to say, hard to do. STABLE is broken as current is, and it seems that 4.4 and 4.3 are also broken for the STLport test. This is a very difficult thing to do for someone that does not know gcc internals. Impossible for me. I don't have the resources (time) and knowledge (compiler coding) to do this. I can only state that: - plain gcc without patches works - gcc295 from ports works - gcc is STABLE and CURRENT is broken - It's not the dewarf unwinding. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message