From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 17:53:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7E91065677; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132D98FC12; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so187477qyk.13 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:53:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4Da7GHhrb+Nnbdx4Sxx+X9Og+gKNDG5s0/yvQ2xOIUA=; b=c96KmpvZiAJiuMGpQExJEwwalShvuSDBaix/mEAG9G14r9EuHowxkE8WO830opB3HL d5zRTp5F4uQdlHOm9DTiXPB+9FyG6q9KXi/+1yGONsmcy91hK71NoNUfrXvmd2JxE1Ig GEGsdQREv/d7vNF9maSO52yWBaonunGrKX5j8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=t4NCafi/0BlGguwoHZ4jZZ9gdfzpqXBpDg9dJkcIVciWvIjkfxr5KYT98rs0ZiL3su ot+t1jDOvEZNar87+v630/4/swkCTUBxVh8cRDJ+t++deevF5W72U7jUgEwt5viLoX4D hTpfMQZ2IRtG6gV6uKuS8Ha9wk9Eja5bvHnAs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.36.207 with SMTP id u15mr5482065qad.332.1279216423050; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.220.5 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C3F49E8.9090201@comcast.net> References: <1275419919.30057.50.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <20100601193733.GA44816@icarus.home.lan> <4C3CBC1E.9030106@omnilan.de> <1279212377.31311.144.camel@soundwave> <1279212602.31311.151.camel@soundwave> <84875A93-3851-476E-8F2E-A7008CA6BD5C@FreeBSD.org> <4C3F49E8.9090201@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:53:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Steve Polyack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable , Brandon Gooch , Sean McAfee , Harald Schmalzbauer , Michael Tuexen , bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com, Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:53:44 -0000 The fact that I WISH it to be MFC'd doesn't mean that I am actually given permission to do so. Jack On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Steve Polyack wrote: > On 07/15/10 13:31, Michael Tuexen wrote: > >> On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> It may have gone in before the RELENG_8_1 tag/branch occurred? SVN >>>> r209309 >>>> >>>> Jacks's change went into stable/8 on June 18: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Also, did anyone provide feedback on SVN r209959 to >>> head/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c ? >>> >>> It's saying "8.1 MFC", so you might want to ask people to test that on >>> stable/8 then expedite the 8.1 MFC as well. >>> >>> >> Maybe Jack can MFC it to stable/8. MFCing to releng/8.1 must come from >> stable/8 anyway. >> There is no need for re@ approval to MFC it into stable/8. >> >> > > As Brian stated, the change has already been MFC'd into stable/8 (June > 18th) with the following comment from Jack: > > "MFC to RELENG8.1 asap" > > > Steve > >> Best regards >> Michael >> >> >>> ~BAS >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > >