From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Apr 22 8:20: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB8B37B6E2 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:20:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA06614; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:20:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 08:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200004221520.IAA06614@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Kevin Day Subject: Re: i386/18154: [PATCH] Add cpu class and features flags sysctls Reply-To: Kevin Day Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR i386/18154; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kevin Day To: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Cc: toasty@dragondata.com, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/18154: [PATCH] Add cpu class and features flags sysctls Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 10:15:03 -0500 (CDT) > > hw.features.mmx > > hw.features.3dnow > > Sine these features are unlikely to be shared by other architectures > FreeBSD runs on, they should be in the machdep.* branch and not hw. > > -GAWollman > > Ok, I wasn't quite sure where the line was drawn. My thoughts there could be a hw.features node for all architectures, and what was under it could vary. But, I see the the argument either way. Doesn't really matter to me. :) -- Kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message